Were female non-Arab converts afforded the same tribal protections as Arab women

Only asking because the tribes were dominant during the creation and peak of Islam. We have the Quranic commands of treating all women with protection and justice, especially the widows and orphans.  I’m mainly referring to the implementation of the Qur’an within tribal systems because I’m aware of a few failures like the Umayyads taxing non-Arab Muslims for protection, tribes rising against each other, and placing their peoples in rank among others, along with a few other failures of human nature. My curiosity stems from the word muhsanat in 4:24, possibly referring to tribally protected women as well. I’m very ignorant on tribal relations, so I’m curious as to how this worked for female non-Arab converts and particularly, single ones, not necessarily from an Islamic standpoint but from a societal-tribal standpoint.
Thank you!

Barīrah was a slave girl who gained freedom and became a mawla (client) of ʿA’isha bint Abi Bakr after manumission. Her story is narrated in early hadith compilations like Sunan Abī Dāwūd (Book of Divorce) which even mentions her walāʾ relationship and human-rights dimensions in marital law contexts. - [Sunan Abī Dāwūd 2231 - cited in Barīrah’s biography]

“The patron took responsibility either to pay the mawlā’s blood money or to avenge him. The tribe obligated itself to protect the mawlā as it would a born member …” - [Mawlas: Freed Slaves and Converts in Early Islam]

So, in early Islamic practice, female converts who became mawālī had actual tribal protection obligations owed to them by their patrons and tribes (e.g., defensor of their life rights), but not full equal tribal rights as freeborn women of the tribe.